Grounds for discrimination

Published: February 3, 2012

It’s been eleven years. They’ve moved his desk to a lonely corner of the office. Co-workers wipe the phone after he’s been on and lob slurs in his direction. Has he told his supervisors about the situation? He doesn’t have to. They take part. 

It isn’t far-fetched that a Trinidadian would be discriminated against on the basis of (real or perceived) sexual orientation. In a 2009 norms and values study commissioned by the Ministry of Social Development 69 percent of respondents indicated that they did not support equal rights for gays and lesbians. Colin Robinson of the Coalition for the Inclusion of Sexual Orientation (CAISO) says that while discrimination and impunity are commonplace, seeking legal recourse is not.

“Gay and trans people don’t report our discrimination and human rights violations to the authorities, even the worst cases. Because what happens when we do?” he questions. “I’ve heard accounts from men and women ridiculed in courts and police stations when they pressed charges. I’ve interviewed guys who were gang-raped and limped around refusing free medical care. A young person we helped had to be taken to hospital by police after his family beat him savagely; the officers merely warned the relatives and never filed charges.  People are not just afraid of the gossip and the impact on job, family and reputation. We forget that gay people are still criminals in the eyes of the law here. So it’s no surprise we aren’t turning to the law for protection.”

An international mandate to press countries into action on these issues has intensified lately.  In October Commonwealth Secretary General Kamalesh Sharma at the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting that “discrimination and criminalisation on grounds of sexual orientation [are] at odds with our values”. Shortly thereafter UK Prime Minister David Cameron threatened to withhold aid from governments that do not reform legislation banning homosexuality. And last week the United States declared that it will use foreign aid and diplomacy to encourage country-level reforms.

“It should never be a crime to be gay,” said Secretary of State, Hilary Clinton.

In Trinidad and Tobago two young attorneys are taking a decidedly different tack. They call it “positive protection”. While many in our region have their eyes trained on our nineteenth century “buggery” laws, “Tell Your Story, TNT” focuses on a relatively recent innovation—our Equal Opportunities Act. That law provides remedies for victims of discrimination, all sorts. Yet it explicitly excludes “sexual preference and orientation” as grounds for protection. The goal is to document enough concrete complaints to make a case—first to the Equal Opportunity Commission (EOC) and then to Parliament—that something needs to be done. Specifically they are looking for instances of discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender expression in the areas of employment, education or public goods and services such as health care or law enforcement.

“I think when you speak to people one-on-one they can be very open minded,” says Jacqueline Bevilaqua. “We haven’t gotten any negative feedback to the work we’re doing. You might have a personal position but very few people would say that gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender (GLBT) persons should be denied opportunities or services. That doesn’t make economic sense and sexuality has no bearing on who’s going to be a good employee.”

Tamara Sylvester is optimistic that a legal success could have social change spin-offs.

“If the law explicitly prohibits discrimination in the workplace and schools, people will be forced to get with the program and become sensitised to the issues. We all have our moral beliefs and they vary from one person to the next but our beliefs do not give us a basis to violate other people. It is not about you changing your values,” she submits. “It’s about tolerance.”

Full text of article available at link below –

Leave a Reply