Gay asylum seekers face 'humiliation'

Published: February 8, 2014

 Home Office officials are under fire for using "shockingly degrading" lines of questioning when interviewing gay and lesbian asylum seekers, despite clear guidance that such an approach is unacceptable.

 
A confidential Home Office document leaked to the Observer reveals how one bisexual asylum seeker was asked a series of lurid questions by a Home Office official, including: "Did you put your penis into x’s backside?" and "When x was penetrating you, did you have an erection? Did x ejaculate inside you. Why did you use a condom?"
 
The document reveals that during five hours of questioning in a UK detention centre, the male asylum seeker was also asked: "What is it about men’s backsides that attracts you?" and "What is it about the way men walk that turns you on?"
 
The questions, typed up by a Home Office employee, and dated last October, have been branded an "interrogation".
 
The Home Office on Saturday admitted that staff were "not permitted to ask inappropriate or intrusive questions", but added that attempts to determine an individual’s sexual orientation were conducted "as sensitively as possible".
 
S Chelvan, a barrister and expert in asylum claims based on sexuality, said the interview, which was conducted with no lawyer present, was "shockingly degrading".
 
He added: "I’m horrified by the nature of the questions that have been highlighted. It’s more like an interrogation than an interview. It is exceptionally troubling that there were questions like whether an individual ejaculated or whether they used a condom. This is an unacceptable investigation of a gay asylum claim. Clearly, something is going terribly wrong here."
 
Immigration barrister Colin Yeo also voiced concern: "This is the worst I have seen, but these sorts of intrusive, abusive questions are features of Home Office interview practice, particularly in cases involving sexuality. The underlying problem is that officials believe everyone is a liar. It leads to a fundamental lack of respect for the people they are dealing with."
Full text of article available at link below –

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *